Electric chair and gavel
In a surprising twist, South Carolina is seeking to resume the use of electric chair and firing squads for executions, ending a long stretch of over a decade without any executions in the state. Legal representatives for a group of inmates on death row, who have exhausted their appeals, recently contended to South Carolina’s Supreme Court that these execution methods are cruel and unusual, a claim contradicted by the state itself. The state maintains that a “painless” execution is not a legal requirement.
For the past 13 years, South Carolina has not carried out any executions, despite there being no official moratorium on the death penalty. This cessation stemmed from the expiration of the drugs previously used for lethal injections and the refusal of companies to sell more unless their identities remained anonymous. During this time, 33 inmates remained on death row.
The state purports that that all three execution methods including lethal injection, the electric chair, and firing squad method, are in alignment with existing legal protocols. The state’s assertion is that the law doesn’t mandate an “instantaneous or painless” requirement for executions.
The executions being argued against involve the electric chair and firing squad methods. During a heated court hearing, the justices questioned the validity of the firing squad method as an unusual punishment, given its sparse use in the U.S. in the past 50 years; it has only been implemented three times, all in Utah. The justices also queried the electrical conductivity of the human skull and its implications for the intensity of pain inflicted through electrocution.
South Carolina lawmakers in 2021 sanctioned the firing squad as an additional execution method. In stark contrast, no bills have been proposed in the state to introduce the contentious nitrogen gas method. This method was employed for the first time in the U.S. in Alabama last month, in which the prisoner respired pure nitrogen gas via a face mask.
For executions in South Carolina, the current law requires inmates to be sent to the electric chair unless they choose an alternative method.
Attorneys for the inmates hold that South Carolina’s shield law, which protects the identities of drug companies and individuals involved in an execution procedure, is more secretive than any other state and impedes the open dissemination of crucial information about execution protocols.
If South Carolina’s Supreme Court approves this proposal, and subsequent appeals are unsuccessful, the state’s death chamber might start receiving inmates again for the first time since May 2011.
In the past, South Carolina used to executes an average of three prisoners a year, with over 60 inmates on death row. However, inmates’ successful appeals and deaths from other causes have reduced this number to 33. Over the past 13 years, only three new prisoners have been sent to death row.
Despite the controversy over execution methods, the trend in South Carolina and other states has been moving towards less frequent use of the death penalty due to rising costs, absence of lethal injection drugs, and sturdier defenses, prompting prosecutors to accept guilty pleas in favor of life sentences without parole.
South Carolina Schools Superintendent Responds to Concerns Over Cellphone Ban's Impact on Emergencies COLUMBIA, S.C.…
South Carolina Attorneys Forced to Choose Execution Method for Inmate In an unprecedented legal move…
SC Supreme Court denies death row inmate's request, execution method chosen The Supreme Court of…
In Stanford, California, the No. 5 Stanford men’s soccer team made waves over the weekend…
Memphis is facing some serious issues as news breaks of an anonymous letter alleging potential…
NCAA Faces Significant Changes as Judge Approves Revenue-Sharing Settlement In a pivotal moment for college…